A BRIEF RECALL
This has to be one of the biggest heresies that I have heard coming out of the Hebrew camp since I have come into the knowledge that I am a Hebrew by blood. This post was a long time in coming and I had hoped that in time Hebrews would have seen sense and thoroughly investigated this issue instead of simply following celebrity Hebrew brothers in place of thinking and reasoning for themselves, but I was wrong. This doctrine has to be one of the most stupid and dangerous doctrines I have ever heard and the thing that is the main issue here is that it hasn’t originated from the Hebrews, this argument originally came from Humanists, yes people who do not believe in a supreme power and only believe in themselves. This is a Humanist doctrine, as are most of the other heresies that seek to undermine the true deity of Christ. You Hebrews running with this nonsense should have at least investigated the origin of this crud before broadcasting it as if it is “higher knowledge”. The first time I heard this I initially thought to myself that this must be some kind of joke, however in recent times I have heard more and more Hebrews promoting this rubbish so I feel it is time for me come out and set the record straight regardless of the flack to come.
NO TRUFFLE SHUFFLING OR TAP DANCING ALLOWED HERE
This post will be brief and will set the record straight on this issue. Most of the videos I have seen in relation to this topic have been around 1 to 2 hours long in which irrelevant topics are frequently raised and injected to throw the viewer off course, inference of many passages and scriptures that have no relevance to the issue are also thrown into the mix to confuse the watcher and make you feel that you no longer hold the capacity to read the scriptures for yourself without the appointment of an “approved” Hebrew celebrity brother or a self appointed deacon lording over you to insure that you come away with the “correct interpretation”, you know the interpretation that will keep your thinking in line with the group(Orwellian). This sounds much like the institutional church and the relationship between the pastors and their congregational members and you would indeed be correct for noting the similarities thereof.
WHAT SAITH THE SCRIPTURES?
Let us now look at the scriptures that deal with this issue and see what the plain reading of them is. We’ll first start with generational line of Christ in Matthew 1:16 as there is something very interesting to note here. It reads:
1:16 – And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
Notice in that verse that Joseph is not linked to Christ, only Mary is in relation to to giving birth to him. Since many Hebrews are now teaching that Joseph was the biological father of Christ, why doesn’t it state that Joseph begat Christ as in the same manner as the verse before it? Every other verse before 16 clearly links the father with the son except here, why? This isn’t the only genealogy that indicates that Joseph had no involvement in the siring of Christ. We now turn to Luke 3:23 which reads:
3:23 – And Jesus himself began to be about 30 years of age, being(AS WAS SUPPOSED) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
As was “supposed” the son of Joseph???? Yet again we witness and read no direct link to Joseph in terms of lineage. Why has that been put there? You mean Joseph was not the biological father of Christ. Sure looks like it and the expounding of the scriptures has only just started. Now let us look at the scriptures that actually deal with the conception of Christ. Matthew 1:18-25 reads:
20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.
So what is the plain reading of these scriptures here?
Mary was pregnant before Joseph got together with her, Joseph finds out that Mary is pregnant and wants to divorce her but execute it in private, Joseph while thinking on how to go about dealing with this matter in sleep is informed in a dream not to divorce Mary, to accept Mary because she has conceived a child through the Holy Spirit and that he should name the child Jesus. We also read how Isaiah 7:14 was fulfilled in the 23rd verse, Joseph accepts Mary as his wife and does not have sexual relations with her until after Christ is born.
That is the plain reading and obvious understanding of those scriptures above and anybody who approaches you with a very different interpretation of those passages needs to have a jolly good reason why you should take their inference over what is plainly written and understandable.
I have heard at this point that many Hebrews teach that the word virgin does not have the same meaning in her case as we know the meaning of the word today. Even if this is true, we must look around the circumstances of the situation to determine which “meaning” should be used. Let us now go to Luke 1:26-37 which reads:
35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.
So what is the plain and obvious understanding of this set of scriptures?
The angel Gabriel is sent to Mary who informs her that she will conceive a child, that she should call his name Jesus, that he will be called the Son of the Most High and that he will sit on and be given the throne of his father David. Mary then asks Gabriel how this will happen seeing as she has not slept with a man. Gabriel then replies that the Holy Spirit will come upon her and she shall be overshadowed with power from on high and therefore that child that has been produced via this path shall be called the son of God. Mary is then told that her cousin who is old is 6 months pregnant and that with God, nothing shall be impossible.
Again, this is the plain reading and obvious understanding of those scriptures above and anybody who attempts to approach you with a very different interpretation of those passages again needs to have a very good reason why you should take their inference in favour of what is plainly written and understandable. Out of Mary’s own mouth, she confirms that the meaning of the word virgin as we know it today applies to her and her situation, so even if there are different meanings for the word “virgin”, they clearly do not apply in the case.
I then hear how Hebrews to counter this then talk about the line of the father being the determining factor and that it is only among the JewISH people that the mother’s line is considered. They also then talk about the line of the kings and how all the kings came through the line of Joseph.
Firstly, in dealing with the first point it should be noted that we are not dealing with an ordinary birth, we are dealing the birth of the son of the Most High who will redeem his people from their plight and also those gentiles in the world who are called by his Father. On dealing with the second point, it is true that all the kings do come through the line of Joseph however, this is a red herring as the only king that is relevant and linked to Christ and the throne is king David. The bible does not state that Christ would sit upon the throne of Solomon or upon the throne of Asa or upon the throne of Josaphat. Of all the kings David is the only one king mentioned as being relevant. Here are some scriptures to prove this:
Psalms 132:11, Isaiah 9:7, Isaiah 37:35, Jeremiah 17:25, Jeremiah 22:2,4,30, Jeremiah 29:16, Ezekiel 34:23-24, Ezekiel 37:24-25, Luke 1:69 just to mention a few. Now both the genealogies of Joseph and Mary go through David. Please check Matthew 1:6 and Luke 3:31. You see, two prime prophesies had to be fulfilled in relation to the coming of Christ, he had to come through the line of David and be born of a virgin(Isaiah 7:14). Obvious both Mary and Joseph fulfill the first together but only a woman can fulfill the second in relation to the virgin status and the conception.
For those foolish Hebrews who cannot think past the flesh, the Holy Spirit being all powerful and being the one who created sexual reproduction and the parts thereof can circumnavigate around the normal methods of producing a child with no difficulties whatsoever, I mean when the Christ states that “with the Most High, NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE”, what does this really mean to you? If you begin to knock the virgin birth, what about the miracles that Christ performed, will you render those under natural circumstances also? This is the dangerous side to this type of teaching.
Let us look at some other scriptures that clearly indicate that Christ was not born in the normal fashion that we all were. Galations 4:4 reads:
Made of a woman???? Why didn’t it say made of a woman and a man, why is only the woman mentioned here in relation to the creating of Christ? If Joseph was indeed the biological father of Christ, why was it not mentioned here? Lets look at Daniel 2:34 which reads:
Again, this stone cut out WITHOUT HANDS is also mentioned in verse 45 which reads:
45 Forasmuch as thou sawest that the stone was cut out of the mountain WITHOUT HANDS, and that it brake in pieces the iron, the brass, the clay, the silver, and the gold; the great God hath made known to the king what shall come to pass hereafter: and the dream iscertain, and the interpretation thereof sure.
We already know that this stone cut out from the mountain represents Christ but what is going on with this business about “WITHOUT HANDS”? Without hands simply indicates that there was no human intervention in the creation of Christ’s physical body. Without in the old English simply means “outside”. Hebrew celebrity brothers don’t really like to talk about this scripture too much and it is a serious spanner in the non virgin birth heresy. There is also another scripture in Colossians 2:11 where another reference to “without hands” is mentioned again, but let us start from Colossians 2:8 first which reads:
2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and VAIN DECEIT, after the TRADITION of men, after the RUDIMENTS OF THE WORLD, and not after Christ.
2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
2:10 And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:
2:11 In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision MADE WITHOUT HANDS, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ:
Therefore, if we are circumcised via a circumcision made without hands ie outside of human intervention, it stands to reason that the author of this circumcision would have had to have had the same origin ie “without hands” or “outside of human intervention”. This is not rocket science when you think about it, but obviously to those with other preconceptions already grounded into their minds, and their determination to hold to onto the stubborn refusal to remove them despite the overwhelming evidence that speaks against their set ideas, the logical and most obvious way forward in their minds must be dismissed at all costs.
It has also been mentioned foolishly by Israelites that there were virgin births before Christ, not knowing that the source of this propaganda is from atheists and humanists. But Tammuz was conceived via a virgin right? Semeramis firstly his mother was not a virgin, very far from it and the second point that should be mentioned here is that there are no pre Christ recorded accounts of virgin births, they ALL post date Christ, ALL OF THEM even though they claim pre Christ authenticity. No, Tammuz was not born of a virgin.
The JewISH sect having been rumbled by the Israelite movement as to who they truly are and where they originally came from are determined to derail this movement and have been successful in part in doing so by introducing some of the most outlandish, ridiculous and dangerous doctrines into the teachings of the Hebrews and most Hebrews who are walking according to the old covenant thus in the flesh and have not received the Spirit within them to guide them and discern true information from red herrings and false data, have picked up this nonsense and run with it at full velocity without not only thinking the matter through but also not investigating the origins of this doctrine and how it chips away at the very deity of Christ.
You Hebrews out there who have retained the ability to think and reason for yourselves and who have the Spirit within you, it would be obvious to you that in the JewISH sect not being able to hide the truth from us, their next move would be to recruit, train and send in traitors from our own people into groups to teach things that are not doctrinally sound and thus bring us back into confusion and over turn this movement.
It is important that we stand strong and do not let usurpers come in and disrupt not only the awakening of our people to who they truly are by bloodline, but also how they move forward after they have received the truth. If the JewISH sect can recruit our own people into the music industry to promote music with no morals and a satanic root, do you really believe that it would be difficult for them to wave a few pounds/dollars at some of our people in regards to this movement and get them to promote things of a satanic nature as good and of the Most High? You better think hard, this movement has already been infiltrated. Remember what Paul stated in Romans 9:6 where he said that not all are Israel which are of Israel. Remember, some of our own people hate us with a passion and are determined to see us destroyed, you would do well to remember this at all times and question doctrine you receive from anybody teaching including myself, always using the scriptures as the final determining factor as to what is a truth and what is a lie. Remember what Peter warned us about in 2 Peter 2:1 which reads:
2:1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as THERE SHALL BE FALSE TEACHERS AMONG YOU, who privily shall bring in DAMNABLE HERESIES, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
I finally take you to a man named Ron Wyatt. Ron Wyatt was a archeologist who unlike the majority of secular archeologists out there today was of a christian background and who sole purpose it was to investigate and prove the existence of Christ. He passed away a number of years ago, however in his lifetime he had made a number of incredible biblical discoveries including Noah’s Ark and the Ark Of The Covenant. He also claims to have found the dried blood of Christ. Do I personally believe him on this? Yes, as a man of his nature, he was simply out for truth. I will allow him to explain the results of the blood sample that he found. All I can say is that if this is true(I have no reason to doubt what he is saying), it places a massive dent in the theory currently being pushed by the majority of Hebrew groups today that Joseph was the biological father of Christ. Not that the scriptures teach that Joseph was the biological father of Christ to begin with, however I believe that this discovery puts an end to the stupidity that many Hebrews have embraced in relation to Christ being conceived in the normal manner when the scriptures clearly do not teach this:
Those Hebrews who still believe that Christ was sired by Joseph are more than welcome to pass comment here and explain this discovery. Blood containing 24 chromosomes, the 24th chromosome is of a male but NOT OF HUMAN ORIGIN, found in the same location where Christ was crucified and the blood is still alive when tested. You heretical Hebrews, I wish you all the best in explaining away this one.
The Decontamination And Deprogramming Process Continues
Blessings In The Heavenly Father