Remember the biblical account of the Pharoah in Egypt who tried to exercise population control on the Hebrews because he feared that the Hebrews would out populate his people(sounds very familiar)? Lets just quickly go over the account of his words. Exodus 1:8-10 reads:
1:8 Now there arose up a new king over Egypt, which knew not Joseph.
1:9 And he said unto his people, Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we:
1:10 Come on, let us deal wisely with them; lest they multiply, and it come to pass, that, when there falleth out any war, they join also unto our enemies, and fight against us, and so get them up out of the land.
In saying this the king of Egypt made the children of Israel work harder and increased their labours, however in doing this to them their numbers increased all the more. He next tactic to control their numbers was to order that all the male children be killed at birth. He appointed 2 midwives over this task, however they refused to carry out his orders because they feared the Most High Ahayah over their control freak king. Exodus 1:15-17 reads:
1:15 And the king of Egypt spake to the Hebrew midwives, of which the name of the one was Shiphrah, and the name of the other Puah:
1:16 And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them UPON THE STOOLS; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live.
1:17 But the midwives feared God, and did not as the king of Egypt commanded them, but saved the men children alive.
For the longest while I was perplexed by the 16th verse. Stools??? What was this guy talking about, women giving birth on stools? Now, I knew what a stool was however I couldn’t connect a stool with a woman giving birth on it.
It turns out that until recently, women actually did give birth on stools and for good reason. For starters, the birth was over in a lot less time, typically a birth would last from 1 to 2 hours at the most. This was because of the upright position utilising gravity to push the baby down and out quickly unlike the conventional western method of today by laying a woman on her back which prolongs the pregnancy and where labour pains can drag on for hours due to the lack of gravity present in that position:
Now why would you use a method of birthing which prolongs the birth and makes the woman suffer for longer? What could be the possible angle with this switch of method? So far I can see that the prolonged labour can be very stressful on the mother and especially on the child, however Big Pharma rears its ugly head yet again because guess what they are giving the woman during her “prolonged” labour, DRUGS, namely pain killing drugs. Big Pharma is in on the take again. These companies must make a buck off you via any means possible, they have no heart and no morals, it is all about the $s and £s to them, nothing more, nothing less. The other point here is a woman laying on her back in a delivery situation for an extended period of time may cause damage to not only her but also her child. Of course big pharma is on hand to help her if she require medication. Apart from pharmacies, hospitals also hold a large supply of drugs.
So there you go ladies, rather than have you give birth within an hour or two at the most using a birthing stool, the hospitals implement a policy where you are placed in a position that guarantees a slow birth, to where you can be then stuffed full of drugs which then pass through the bloodstream to your unborn child which no doubt causes damage to the baby but earns big pharma more money in the pocket. Remember what I stated before in The Colostrum Conspiracy, that these elitists have implemented strategies to bring a child under a total warfare scenario from the moment of conception to ensure that a weak and unintelligent child is born and thus cannot be a threat to these control freak inbreds.
The Deprogramming And Decontamination Process Continues
Blessings In The Most High Our Heavenly Father